The engine takes your games apart move by move. Axes show your manner — sacrifices, pressure, sharpening. Coach language tells you what to do with it.
One analysis of your games — three moments where it works. Everything below is in development; no dates promised.
before the game
Enter your opponent's username — and see their manner: where they drift, where to steer the game, what to leave alone. From their games, not from hearsay.
Prep report
in developmentan opponent from your tournament table
based on their recent games
interface mock · sample data
after the game
Not “you played okay-ish”, but where exactly the quality leaks: phase, colour, position class — measured against your peers. One main growth area instead of a laundry list of weaknesses.
Growth area #1
in developmentEndgames as Black
Focusing here brings the fastest quality gain.
interface mock · sample data
between games
Your axes against a field of peers, your manner's drift month by month, the classic closest to your style. Manner, not rating: the card doesn't say how strong you are — it says who you are.
Style card
in developmentYou sharpen notably more than your peers, breadth of choice is lower — you force where the tension could be kept.
interface mock · sample data
Early access means the beta queue. No dates promised — honestly.
01
Stockfish walks through every move: decision quality, position complexity, how many reasonable continuations were on the table.
02
Sacrifice appetite, sharpening, pressure, breadth of choice, quality steadiness. Each axis is a percentile against a comparison field: 50 is the middle, 100 is the edge.
03
Short phrases about what's visible on the board: where you press, where you let go, where your profile swings.
We only count games actually played. The card measures behaviour at the board — not a label and not a strength rating. The project is in beta; no dates promised.
Four anonymous cards — four names: Alekhine, Petrosian, Spassky, Fischer. Each name is used exactly once. Cards are computed from peak-years games; the scale is a place within the pool of ten legends (100 — top, 10 — bottom). Manner, not strength.
A universal middle with a broad palette of plans; sharpens only when the position calls for it.
A calm, stable profile.
built from 299 officially published tournament games (peak years) · axes are percentiles within the 10-legend pool
Sacrifices least of all; keeps the position maximally broad and flexible, never forcing.
The smoothest, calmest profile in the pool.
built from 299 officially published tournament games (peak years) · axes are percentiles within the 10-legend pool
Mid-pool on almost every axis with a dry, lucid manner: complexity below average.
A narrow error corridor — technique before fireworks.
built from 166 officially published tournament games (peak years) · axes are percentiles within the 10-legend pool
High complexity and strong sharpening — yet material sacrifices are rare: the attack is built without investment.
A large quality amplitude: brilliance and blunders side by side.
built from 300 officially published tournament games (peak years) · axes are percentiles within the 10-legend pool
Join the waitlist. When your beta turn comes, we'll run your games through the same engine that computed the legends' cards in the quiz. The rating helps us build the right comparison field — your peers, not random players.